i would use mysql for some reasons * one master where write changes * every machine can run a replication slave * no single-point-of-failure * postfix needs only read-permissions so there nerver writes on any slave * you can even define each mysqld in each postfix server for failover
samba/nfs is fine as long this machine/connection is alive but if you have troubles there all your servers are down Am 01.03.2011 10:51, schrieb aa: > And what about using a shared disk space on a single machine that contains > configuration file of every mail server. > Every machine that has postfix can access these configuration files using > samba or NFS...a kind of shared folder > that can be contained on a postfix server machine too without using a > dedicated machine.... > > 2011/3/1 Luis Esteves <luisdobenf...@gmail.com > <mailto:luisdobenf...@gmail.com>> > > > Hi, > > I'll have a look to this tools, I'm curious... > > Thanks a lot, > Luis > > > Victor Duchovni wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:52:17PM -0800, Luis Esteves wrote: > > > >> > >> Many Thanks Victor for the answer. > > > > An answer anyway, there are a few ways to address this... Some people > > would use tools like "cfengine" or similar. Basically, anything that > > lets you manage configuration files on multiple Unix hosts. > > > > -- > > Viktor. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > > http://old.nabble.com/Update-Postfix-transport-file-on-multiple-servers-tp31008507p31038134.html > Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald the lounge interactive design GmbH A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17 CTO / software-development / cms-solutions p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40 icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
