On 2011-03-14 12:11 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2011-03-14 11:30:14 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2011-03-14 11:12 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> On 2011-03-14 10:41:16 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: >>>> Imo, zero/unlimited is *never* a good idea...
>>> Why (for mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit)? >> Because... *unlimited* *anything* is never a good idea... too much >> room for error. > That's only a point of view. One can have a different one: Doesn't make it right... but please, by all means, feel free to shoot yourself in the foot as many times as you like. > I mean that if one sets mailbox_size_limit and virtual_mailbox_limit > explicitly, One could say the same thing about every setting in postfix. Repeat: changing the defaults without a good reason is never a good idea. -- Best regards, Charles
