On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:39:43 -0400
Jerry <postfix-u...@seibercom.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:43:09 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> articulated:
> 
> > pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 4/10/2011 10:33 PM:
> > 
> > > My thought on auto combating this is to use a CIDR list to kick
> > > these networks (and only these networks) over to a greylist policy
> > > that delays these emails for 4+ hours. By then, most of the bad IPs
> > > would be listed in one or more RBL and be blocked.
> > > 
> > > So, has anyone else already done something like this?
> > 
> > Why bother with this complex greylisting setup?  Simply hammer the big
> > blocks with a CIDR entry and whitelist individual IPs in the range
> > from which you need legit mail.  If such IPs are used to send both
> > snowshoe spam and ham, that's a human shield tactic, and deserves
> > permanent blocking, FOREVER.  If anyone complains, lay the full
> > skinny on them as to why.  I.e. lay the blame at the proper feet, and
> > direct complaints at the guilty.
> > 
> > Life is too short to waste _your_ valuable time playing whack-a-mole
> > with spammers, isn't it?  We don't live in a totally "collateral
> > damage free" world.  People must get used to this.
> 
> Unless of course you get hit with a law suit.

My server, my rules.
> 

Reply via email to