Le samedi 11 juin 2011 00:28, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 6/10/2011 4:04 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> > hi folks
> >
> > I asked a question.
> > there are providers that remove information from headers like X-Mailer
> > Received
> >
> >
> > when is there any good uses and customs
> >
> > This is easy to set up with information like this
> > /^Received:/        IGNORE
>
> The above is a bad idea.  You'll lose valuable tracking
> information.  NOT RECOMMENDED.
>
> Some people like to remove Received headers from their
> internal hosts. It's OK to remove your own Received headers,
> but the above rule will remove all Received headers.
>
> > /^User-Agent:/      IGNORE
>
> This won't break anything, but there's no reason for it.


I came to these two rules: that here

/^(Received: from ).*\[192\.168\.1+\..+\]\)(.*)/ REPLACE 
${1}localhost([127.0.0\
.1] (may be forged by MTA or private))${2}
/^(Received: from ).*roundcube.fakessh.eu(.*)/ REPLACE 
${1}localhost([127.0.0.1\
] (may be forged by MTA or private ))${2}

they are suitable



-- 
 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7
 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7

Attachment: pgp2DH97VWHNO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to