Hi list, Just by looking at the headers "Return-Path", "From:" and "To:" one can sense that the following is spam ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path:<[email protected]> X-Original-To: [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.example.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17E557547EC for<[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:39:48 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.example.gr Received: from mail.example.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.example.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yHroNA2goYHC for<[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:39:40 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [186.194.3.66] (unknown [186.194.3.66]) by mail.example.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7567357547E2 for<[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:39:39 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [95.53.111.119] (helo=uvthdjg.mnghdffxosiys.net) by with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMI1H-7816uo-2U for [email protected]; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:39:39 -0300 From:<[email protected]> To:<[email protected]> Subject: Re: CV 54 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- a) helo host uvthdjg.mnghdffxosiys.net does not have an ip b) rdns for 95.53.111.119 gives pppoe.95-53-111-119.dynamic.lenobl.avangarddsl.ru c) Envelope sender ie "return path" is different that From: header d) from: and to: headers are pretending to be postmaster @ my domain. Is there an rfc compliant way to reject this ??? Thanks in advance for your help. Regards Harry.
