Am Sonntag 17 Juli 2011, 13:33:37 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 17.07.2011 12:49, schrieb Thomas Zehbe:
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I have an installtion using bitdefender as a virus scanner using the
> > content_filter option.
> > bitdefender's smtp daemon listens on port 10025, in main.cf therefore this
> > is defined:
> >
> > content_filter = smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025
> >
> > In master.cf a second instance of smtpd is defined, listening on port 10026:
> >
> > 127.0.0.1:10026 inet n - n - 10 smtpd -o
> > content_filter= -o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
> >
> > When smtp tries to send the mail to bitdefender for scanning, this happens:
> >
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: 220
> > linuxgw.myown.net ESMTP Postfix
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: warning: host
> > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] greeted me with my own hostname linuxgw.myown.net
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: EHLO
> > linuxgw.myown.net
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
> > 250-linuxgw.myown.net
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
> > 250-PIPELINING
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
> > 250-SIZE 502400000
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
> > 250-VRFY
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
> > 250-ETRN
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:
> > 250-XVERP
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: 250
> > 8BITMIME
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: warning: host
> > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] replied to HELO/EHLO with my own hostname
> > linuxgw.myown.net
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: connect to subsystem
> > private/defer
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: send attr nrequest = 0
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: send attr flags = 0
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: send attr queue_id = 2859B35121
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: send attr original_recipient =
> > tz@localhost
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: send attr recipient =
> > t...@localhost.myown.net
> > Jul 17 11:42:55 linuxgw postfix/smtp[20313]: send attr reason = mail for
> > 127.0.0.1:10025 loops back to myself
> >
> > main.cf contains
> > mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain,$mydomain
>
> FIRST: Do NOT send debug logs if not requested because they are mostly
> useless verbose and contains not more informations as the obly interesting
> "mail for 127.0.0.1:10025 loops back to myself"
Sorry, i did this to prove that smtp really got this answer.
>
> We are using "check_recipient_access" and a table with a filter for each
> domain and i am püretty sure the "spamfilter" smtp instance does the trick
I don't understand this statement. Which trick do you mean? If i "telnet
127.0.0.1 10025", i get exactly this greeting. Just as smtp does.
>
> master.cf:
> spamfilter unix - - n - 30 smtp -o disable_dns_lookups=yes -o
> smtp_data_done_timeout=1200 -o
> smtp_send_xforward_command=yes -o max_idle=1h -o max_use=1000
I read nothing so far about spamfilter service.
>
> the domains having as example the value "FILTER spamfilter:[127.0.0.1]:10025"
> what means ypu can use different filters for different domains
>
>
Thanks
Thomas
