On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:48:34AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > ACCEPT is simply to explain only if it disables all further checks. > Things become messy otherwise.
Maybe we should call it other than ACCEPT, then - to make it clear that other restrictions elsewhere may still reject the message? Would that be simple enough to explain if we pick a proper name and description in the man page? I think so. Some names to consider: PERMIT, BYPASS, DONE, STOP, EXIT. I think that PERMIT more clearly indicates that we're talking about permission from this specific check, not acceptance of the message. In a sense, I need a DUNNO2, but that's probably not a good name. Alexander
