SPF, DKIM, FBL everything being followed, but still no more than 3-4k delivery to hotmail/rediff. Any ideas group?? Can these destinations be classified as dead, when they start deferring?
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:59 PM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2011 08:23:53 Mark Goodge wrote: > > To be more specific, Yahoo's code TS01 doesn't mean "You are > > sending us too much email and we want you to slow down". It means > > "We think you might be a spammer, so we are setting you a simple > > test of whether you can follow instructions". If you pass the > > test, then when you restart sending then you'll be able to get > > everything through - it won't be rate-limited by Yahoo. > > I don't know what their TS01 means, but I do know that it does not > mean what they say it does. I have seen it on my small site before, > where I am reasonably certain that we could have caused no user > complaints. > > At the time it was a participatory mailing list much like this one, > with seven Y! subscribers. I did nothing and the mail eventually was > delivered. Nowadays (after having been listed at DNSWL.org awhile, > which might have helped) our Yahoo mail is delivered along with all > the rest of it. > > If the OP's site is cranking out enough bulk mail such as to create a > logjam and eventual bounces, that site needs to sign up for feedback > loops, as suggested upthread. Legitimate bulk mail sending is a big > chore. Consider that ESPs actually earn their money. Sometimes doing > things in-house is more expensive than outsourcing. > -- > Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless > "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header >
