Yes, its for an application we are building. The mail systems between each other are private, its an application we have that sends emails to certain users within our organization to enter data onto our company portal (custom) that is attached in the email. I'm trying to figure out if there is a method of customizing postfix to send back specific messages to the data systems to be able to isolate certain processes we're trying to create. I'm asking for help/suggestions, not condescending attitude and assumptions.
To answer your question, no I don't do its a good idea if its going to be a public facing server. Yes you'd get black listed quickly, trust me, I've experienced the paranoid mail systems of AOL, Hotmail, and friends who will blacklist even legit mailings. Lastly, thanks for any suggestions or direction to my issue. On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 03.02.2012 16:12, schrieb TFML: >> Could someone point me the right direction... >> >> I'm attempting to send an autoreply on a catchall. We receive message from >> sender (From: sen...@domain.tld) to our catchall (Actual mainbox) account >> (To: j...@domain.tld), then the autoreply will send a message back to send >> and the headers look as follows: >> >> From: catch...@domain.tld >> To: sen...@domain.tld >> >> What I would like to change is the "From" address to be "j...@domain.tld" >> instead of "catch...@domain.tld" if possible. If not possible, can I pass >> "orig_to" variables to a message from a perl auto reply? The message body >> would have: >> >> Originally sent to j...@domain.tld >> >> Any information would be greatly appreciated. > > do you really think any autoreply on catch-all is a good idea? > > this meany finally that every mass spam attack not detected > and trying all sotrts of @yourdomain will produce a autreply > and in the worst case to a forged sender which results in quickly > get blacklisted all over the world! >
