On Thu, 10 May 2012 23:23:43 +0200 Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org> wrote:
> Den 2012-05-10 14:40, James Seymour skrev: > > > Eh? Explain, please? > > check_policy_service must be after reject_unlisted_recipient [snip] > > that makes sure greylist is not called for unlisted users that will > be rejected as unknown users later [snip] That does not solve the problem at hand. (Besides: One might argue that generating a delay in a "user does not exist" response is a Good Thing. Slows the spammers down and really doesn't have all that much effect on legitimate senders.) And, with that, I guess we're done with this discussion. Only solution is to move the SPF check to sender restrictions, and I don't care to engage in that complexity. Thanks for the feedback, everybody. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.
