On Jan 17, 2013, at 09:25, Jamie Griffin wrote: > * Ned Slider <n...@unixmail.co.uk> [2013-01-17 04:25:04 +0000]: > >> On 16/01/13 22:20, Erwan David wrote: >>> Le 16/01/2013 23:17, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- >>>>> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of TFML >>>>> Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2013 7:55 AM >>>>> To: Postfix users >>>>> Subject: Recommendations for antivirus >>>>> >>>>> I'm running a server on average week we receive 14,000, send 19,000, >>>>> and in total deferred/bounced/rejected 5,000 -- Can you guys recommend >>>>> a good antivirus that will work well with postfix. Meaning efficient in >>>>> processing emails without dropping them into oblivion or kill the >>>>> server CPU and/or Memory? Any suggestions will be fantastic! >>>>> >>>> I recommend Amavisd-new and clam. >>>> >>>> >>> You may also use clamav as a milter. >>> >> >> Another recommendation for ClamAV. >> >> As ClamAV is used predominantly in mail setups, their signature >> database seems to do fairly well against email-borne threats. >> Further, it's easy to create and add your own signatures allowing >> you to respond immediately to an outbreak rather than waiting for >> signatures to get added to official updates. > > clamav with Sanesecurity signatures - search google for them. easy to install.
We use ClamAV here as well with clamav-milter, although we found the Sanesecurity signatures to be too strict to use for straight rejection. YMMV, of course, be sure to at least test :-) Cya, Jona
