On 02/20/2013 07:16 PM, Vince Wang wrote:

Hello,

We have a configured postfix email server worked well when we had it on the public IP. After we moved it behind our firewall on a intranet with ip 192.168.xxx.xxx, we found it is very slow when we send newsletter.


How is DNS set up in comparison with the previous server ?
Badly configured DNS can certainly slow things down, especially on outgoing mail.
Any even moderately busy mailserver should have a local DNS cache.

Server info: Ubuntu 10.4 32 bit running on 4cpus + 8GB memory VM ( VMware host )


A 32-bit OS with 8GB of memory ? only 3.5GB of that will be used, ever.
Regardless, postfix hardly uses any memory, unless you are receiving hundreds of 10MB messages concurrently. That is much more relevant for mail performance is storage I/O - and you don't mention anything related to storage.

As I just start learning about postfix so I tried to figure how it works. I sent a newsletter to 1100 members last week

How many *messages* did you send ?

and monitored the queue in the webmin and mailq, and the postfix log. After I clicked the "send" button on our web page, I found that the messages are added into the queue for 15 minutes and then I saw messages are sent out from the log file for around 15 minutes.


So you are seeing an average processing speed of 1.2 messages per second before queue, and another average 1.2 messages per second during delivery ? Show logs that exhibit these delays; postfix logs detailed delay statistics for each message delivered.

content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024


If you're submitting via smtpd(8) then all locally submitted mail will be scanned, which is patently useless in this case.

smtpd_recipient_limit = 100000

That is insane.

qmgr_message_active_limit = 50000

line_length_limit = 204800

maximal_queue_lifetime = 2d

queue_run_delay = 4000s

minimal_backoff_time = 4000s


Do not mess with these values unless you know exactly what they do.

No logs, so how do you expect us to deduce what is happening here ?


--
J.

Reply via email to