On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:59:37PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > I see negligible benefit from an SNI implementation for Postfix. > > Is it time to add an anti-SNI rationale section to TLS_README? This > would set a bad precedent, there is no limit to the number of > non-features we could document.
Rather than putting it in TLS_README, I think a FAQ would be more fitting. I know we used to have a FAQ document, but it has long ago been abandoned. We get a lot of the same questions here, and some ardent Googlers still stumble upon the old faq.html page. Perhaps rather than a DNS_README as you suggested in another thread, that could be worked into a FAQ? I agree, DNS is a vital subject to most MTA administrators, but here too it's not going to cover actual Postfix features, for the most part. -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
