-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/27/2013 8:37 PM, Jamie wrote: > The output of postconf -n was submitted in an earlier post (on > Tuesday). it is archived here > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2013-02/0523.html.
The > > useful information gained from your postconf is: a) It's very unlikely postfix is an open relay b) you're using a content_filter, so that may explain the "connect from [127.0.0.1]" log snippit. > > Its difficult to obtain more information now, since the > spamming has stopped after I blocked the offenders IP's. > Re-enabling the IP's hasn't I was hoping to see logs of the original incident. > > Frankly at this stage, I'd rather leave a gaping hole in > Postfix, than put up with further abuse from the "veteran" > members of this forum. I'm sorry if this feels like abuse; that's not the intent. A few of us here wanted to see evidence before sending you on wild goose chase. You'll just have to trust me when I tell you the people who made a diagnosis without evidence weren't doing you any favors - -- they wasted a lot of your time looking for problems that didn't exist, and drowned out the few posts that were actually useful. Peace, -- Noel Jones -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRLsvrAAoJEJGRUHb5Oh6gKQsH/1HT2f+E4Jx2jYPmMib/oDGe 2qFZ7LM6b4rpQE5FIcxkM8DDtwoDhiDMTKswt90R06HXdo3u2kSQSs88pjBVTz2X wv1apq6u3kDOwde/WUGCFxPhsH6fl9/mhvPD2aI5EGzahusW54BJebFW4d4t7ocj vG/IivFzZiJspcyI7AKw3H/8g8UL9v/zB6QgpEmraHsv7dkxEtr1XiKPqwNka/Ux Xc+UZoEHuHh1uKhvNUqDPec9gt/lxKs4aLj1H2/sAopTVoPHTEwk5iov2d/fs0X8 h3j9pLZyuS26ediOefRcOpHUeYUXM2Ahkz9pp35iIlKbO9Xl38HsIoRJXLbVAZU= =rrEy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
