On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Wietse Venema wrote: > > That?s untrue because it certainly makes a difference whether you > > send mails in parallel or serial, especially when the receiving > > Connection caching has nothing to do with concurrency. Sheesh.
I was assuming that, when you already have a connection to a receiving MX, you’d not open another one but reuse the existing one, so it would, of course, have something to do with that. If not… well, that’s the qmail model. > I welcome you to propose a design that is as scalable as the rest I am *not* interested in Postfix. I’m not even primarily working with Postfix. I came here because I was suffering, on the receiving side, from perceived Postfix misbehaviour. I’ve got a configuration item with which I can reduce the possibility of the behaviour becoming an issue, which has helped me. That was it. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Sebastian Mancke
