Am 10.05.2013 08:26, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: > On 5/9/2013 9:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 09.05.2013 16:44, schrieb Stan Hoeppner: >>> Normally I'd avoid arguing with your Reindl as it simply >>> clutters the list >> >> keep this bullshit for you > > Nice etiquette...
and what was your quoted line clown ? >>> On 5/9/2013 7:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> if you have a A-record for "example.com" and you incoming >>>> mail-server is on this IP you do not need any MX record >>>> and postfix will happily use the A-record to deliver mail >>> >>> When did you last come across a domain configured strictly for fallback >>> to A? While RFC may require it >> >> NOT SO LONG AGO >> >> a few years ago i was so naive and stupid to implement >> a DNS check in the verify-function of my php-framework >> to prevent import / subscribe to newsletter lists with >> undeliverable domains >> >> i had it to learn the hard way that RFC's are >> not only for fun > > You missed the point entirely. I think this is because you are > predisposed to argue with anyone who disagrees with you, even when they > are correct and you are incorrect. Hence the preface in my previous reply but your problem is that you are not correct
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
