[email protected]:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
>
>
> Wietse Venema:
> > [email protected]:
> >> i saw robert's sys4.de link and also
> >>
> >> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.11.3.html
> >>
> >> recently mail_version = 2.11.3 arrived into debian jessie
> >>
> >> i still unfortunately receive dkim sig errors for essentially the same
> >> domains prior to the update, that are certain of good sigs including
> >>
> >> https://www.had-pilot.com/py/had.html
> >
> >
> > TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
> >
> > TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
> >
> > Thank you for using Postfix.
>
> i see
>
> Thank you for using Postfix. (sic)
>
> it may work with others though i would be disappointed, but if you yell
> at me for making a mistake, you will not achieve your desired outcome,
> and i will calmly move on
>
> not happy ?
>
> enforce an email that does not have Re: in the subject and without
> postconf -n in the body to be rejected and save your throat
Here is an idea: if you want to be helped, then you need to provide
information so that other people can figure where the error is: in
Postfix, or in the way that you use Postfix. That requires more
than the version information.
Wietse
