On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:14:51PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 17.02.2015 um 19:05 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> >On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:02:27PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> >
> >>>(*) The exceptions are REJECT and DISCARD which terminate further
> >>>table lookups because the decision is obviously final.
> >>
> >>and DUNNO
> >NO! That's not a final decision, processing of more headers
> >continues
>
> accepted but surprising, i would have thougth it's even in header_checks
> like in access tables a way to place rules on top to skip anything after -
> not needed anything like reject until now in context of header_checks, hence
> unclear
Only surprising if your mental model is incorrect, with header
checks applying to all headers at once. Postfix header checks are
not like Sieve, the rules apply one header line at a time.
--
Viktor.
