On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:27:57 -0700 Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can never know if any of your intended recipient addresses pass > through such a relay, thus my opinion is if you're concerned about > your mail being delivered, you can't use SPF -all. To that end, then, my lists by default tend to be set to reply-to-list, and they don't munge the sender (From:) address. So a sample header set from FFML from a recent admin post: ----- Return-Path: <ffml-bounces [email protected]> X-Original-To:[email protected] From: Dennis Carr <[email protected]> To: [email protected] X-BeenThere:[email protected] Reply-To: The Fanfiction Mailing List<[email protected]> List-Id: The Fanfiction Mailing List<ffml.chez-vrolet.net> Errors-To: [email protected] Sender: "ffml"<ffml-bounces [email protected]> ----- Sorry about the line breaks - Sylpheed is set to 72 characters and really, really wants to word-wrap. =/ In short, +all and -all are foregone (both bad ideas for their own reasons), and with the above post it all goes out (because a: is me), but with 300+ users on Yahoo and MSFT domains, am I better off setting '~all' or '?all'? Note, DKIM is pending at this point - I'll be reading up on it in my Copious Free Time(TM). =) (Bad news is that I won't have much time between now and Labor Day weekend, as I'm preparing for a vacation in Portland OR. Good news is that, for now, everything seems to be going well - but the only list traffic that's flown out since fixing the record is that which I've sent, so I can't confirm that this will work correctly quite yet.) -Dennis Carr
