Travis Dolan:
> Requested config dump
> 
> alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
> always_bcc = smtp@custom_smtp_transp...@example.com
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
> config_directory = /etc/postfix
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024

Do you have any content_filter= settings in master.cf? Try the
command "postconf -P" (Postfix 2.11 and later), otherwise use eye
balls...

Perhaps all you're doing with "postsuper -r" is pushing mail around
the content filter.

> dc_destination_concurrency_limit = 100
> dc_destination_recipient_limit = 100

Good, you are running a modern Postfix that shows per-transport
settings.

        Wietse

> dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
> inet_interfaces = all
> inet_protocols = all
> mailbox_size_limit = 0
> message_size_limit = 26214400
> mydestination = mail.example.com localhost.example.com, localhost,
> ip-xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx.us-west-2.compute.internal
> mydomain = example.com
> myhostname = mail.example.com
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 172.31.0.0/16 10.0.1.0/24
> myorigin = example.com
> readme_directory = no
> recipient_delimiter = +
> relayhost =
> smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache
> smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Ubuntu)
> smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 100
> smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_client_access
> hash:/etc/postfix/policyd_override, check_policy_service inet:
> 127.0.0.1:10031, permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,reject_unknown_sender_domain,
> reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> reject_unlisted_recipient,reject_unauth_destination,
> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
> reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
> reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.2,
> reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.3, reject_rbl_client
> dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.4, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.5,
> reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.7, reject_rbl_client
> dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.9,reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.11,
> reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.12, warn_if_reject
> reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
> reject_rhsbl_sender abuse.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
> reject_rhsbl_sender whois.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
> reject_rhsbl_sender bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
> reject_rhsbl_sender postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org, permit
> smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated
> defer_unauth_destination
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks = $mynetworks
> smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
> smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
> smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
> smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/example.com-gd_bundle-g2-g1.crt
> smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/example.com.crt.pem
> smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/example.com.key.pem
> smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
> smtpd_use_tls = yes
> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
> virtual_gid_maps = static:8
> virtual_mailbox_base = /vmstore/vmail/
> virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/
> mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf
> virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/
> mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
> virtual_minimum_uid = 7777
> virtual_transport = dovecot
> virtual_uid_maps = static:7777
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:34 AM Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > > On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Travis Dolan <travis.do...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I am working from the following data
> > >
> > > qshape deferred = TOTAL 10
> > > qshape -s deferred = TOTAL 9
> > >
> > > qshape active = TOTAL 2819
> > > qshape -s active = TOTAL 1469
> > >
> > > If I am reading these results incorrectly please let me know.
> > >
> > > No mail sits on any form of a file server, all queues are local to
> > sending server.
> > >
> > > You mentioned clocks, that could be a potential issue. The sending
> > server in this case is UTC, and the receiving server is PST. How would this
> > manifest itself?
> >
> > This might be a good time to post "posconf -n" output.
> >
> > Throughput = concurrency/latency.  If the active queue
> > occupancy for this destination is high, either the latency
> > is high or the concurrency is low.
> >
> > Running "postsuper -r", and setting excessive concurrency
> > limits is likely to make things worse.
> >
> > --
> >         Viktor.
> >

Reply via email to