Wietse Venema writes:

> while investigation unexpected bounces, I noticed that the unionmap did not
> handle errors of submaps properly. If a submap generated an error, the
> unionmap would not.

Cool. Can you also check how pipemap handles this case?

I checked and pipemap shows correct behaviour (e.g. if one of the submaps is
an LDAP map that returns an error then the map itself also returns that error).



Reply via email to