>Now, here is an inconistany of logging ( i think ) by postfix. > >I point to this line,: ?sweeper2.stater.com[193.172.8.206]:25: >220-sweeper.stater.com ESMTP ? > >More consistand would be (sweeper2.stater.com[193.172.8.206]):25: >220-sweeper.stater.com ESMTP ?
The form: client: request from client server: response from server is consistent with the widely-used convention to show a protocol transcript in Internet RFC documents. Wietse