>> since the user's intent is clearly obvious. > What is the clearly obvious intent of 192.0.2.8/28 or 192.0.2.31/27? How > should Postfix guess which part of the CIDR notation is wrong?
I consider the netmask to be always primary - any bits set to the right of the mask are inconsequential and should be tossed. If the netmask is specified wrong (won't parse) or is /0 then it's automatic /32. As improbable as anything to the left of /8 would be, I don't think it's justified to meddle. ________________________________ If you wish to view the CPA Global group email disclaimer, please click here<https://www.cpaglobal.com/Privacy/CPAGlobalEmailDisclaimer/> ________________________________
