Florian Coulmier:
> > Postfix stores size information in the queue file. What size does the
> > queue manager log fot this specific message?
>
> Here are the information in queue file, as shown by a ?postcat ?q? on the
> message queue ID :
>
> *** ENVELOPE RECORDS deferred/3/2/A/32A559F491 ***
> message_size: 13870598 816 1 0
> 13870598
> message_arrival_time: Fri Oct 6 10:12:35 2017
> create_time: Fri Oct 6 10:12:35 2017
>
> (note this is a deferent message than from my last email, but the problem is
> the same).
>
>
> > Right. This suggests that either the size information in the queue file
> > is
> > wrong, or that the SIZE announcement was malformed (i.e. buggy SMTP
> > server).
> > This requires a packet-level dump to see if there are stray
> > carriage-returns
> > or other unexpected content in thhe EHLO response.
>
> I have done such network capture. Here is the hex-dump of the server response
> after EHLO command (as displayed by tshark):
>
> 0000 00 50 56 9b 64 b4 00 50 56 9b 30 58 08 00 45 00 .PV.d..PV.0X..E.
> 0010 00 8e 1e da 40 00 37 06 fb ca d5 29 8e 67 ac 11 ....@.7....).g..
> 0020 19 23 00 19 fc 26 f3 55 0e 57 8b 00 b0 b3 80 18 .#...&.U.W......
> 0030 04 02 25 56 00 00 01 01 08 0a 8b eb 30 0d 51 41 ..%V........0.QA
> 0040 c6 84 32 35 30 2d 53 49 5a 45 20 31 32 35 38 32 ..250-SIZE 12582
> 0050 39 31 32 0d 0a 32 35 30 2d 44 53 4e 0d 0a 32 35 912..250-DSN..25
> 0060 30 2d 45 4e 48 41 4e 43 45 44 53 54 41 54 55 53 0-ENHANCEDSTATUS
> 0070 43 4f 44 45 53 0d 0a 32 35 30 2d 41 55 54 48 20 CODES..250-AUTH
> 0080 4e 54 4c 4d 0d 0a 32 35 30 2d 38 42 49 54 4d 49 NTLM..250-8BITMI
> 0090 4d 45 0d 0a 32 35 30 20 4f 4b 0d 0a ME..250 OK..
That looks wrong. Where is the first EHLO response line? The above
starts in the middle of the response.
Can you share a packed dump OFF-LIST so I can see what happens between
SENDING ehlo and receiving the reply? The entire TCP connection would
be best.
Wietse
