On Dec 12, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote: >>> I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using >>> amavisd-new when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ? > >> On 12.12.17 16:12, Sven Schwedas wrote: >> There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know of >> is Rspamd. > > maybe mimedefang and sagator. > >>> The site I have this in mind for receives a moderate amount of e-mail per >>> day. > >> IMO I'd stick to amavis – while Rspamd /can/ perform better at large >> scale, the documentation is awful. So stick to what you know. > > not that amavisd couldn't have better docs :-) Hi everyone, Ok, good to know that amavisd-new is still a reasonable solution! Thank you for mentioning rspamd. I had only briefly checked that out (I really like that Lua is the integrated scripting language - I’ve used Lua on a number of other projects), but the fact that the documentation is lacking is a show stopper for me. I definitely agree with the sentiment that incomplete documentation is a bug. Thanks again for your feedback, - J
