On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 09:14:30AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > We are encountering errors with several domains similar to the one > reported by samba.org: > > Jul 18 22:36:38 mx31 postfix-p25/smtpd[17802]: lost connection after > DATA (0 bytes) from mailroot5.namespro.ca[158.85.87.68] > Jul 18 22:36:38 mx31 postfix-p25/smtpd[17802]: disconnect from > mailroot5.namespro.ca[158.85.87.68] ehlo=2 starttls=1 mail=1 rcpt=2 > data=0/1 commands=6/7
This does not look *at all* similar to me. The client sent: EHLO STARTTLS + TLS complete handshake EHLO (inside TLS encrypted stream) MAIL FROM: (inside TLS encrypted stream) RCPT TO: (inside TLS encrypted stream) RCPT TO: (inside TLS encrypted stream) DATA: (inside TLS encrypted stream) Then connection was lost after "DATA". This is *not* a TLS handshake failure. Looks rather more like an ordinary message transmission failure, or perhaps data-stage greylisting, ... You really need to show more of the (non-verbose) logging for this session and the below. You're cutting out critical context. > Jul 18 23:41:45 mx31 postfix-p25/smtpd[97338]: NOQUEUE: > client=mail.rosedale.ca[66.135.118.147] > Jul 18 23:41:45 mx31 postfix-p25/smtpd[97338]: lost connection after > DATA (0 bytes) from mail.rosedale.ca[66.135.118.147] > . . . > > This is causing us problems in our operational departments. Based on > the message traffic surrounding this issue I have changed the client > certificate request setting to 'no' to see if that improves delivery. A good idea, but exceedingly unlikely to make any difference for the cases above. -- Viktor.