Thank you Scott K. I just read the RFC7208, very well written.
My favorite line was at the end in the second to last paragraph, talking about TempError local policy considerations: "..this adds one more piece of complexity to an already non-trivial environment" I'll say. I will look at it some more tomorrow, I suspected somehow my server/system was not doing dns lookups properly, getting an "Errno 22 Invalid dns argument" in my mail.log. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Kitterman <post...@kitterman.com> To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: SPF Temperrors - minor thing Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:32:51 -0400 On Tuesday, March 26, 2019 01:49:08 PM Esteban L wrote: > Hello, > > My SPF record appears to be in order, using the SPF query tool at > kitterman dot com. > > Also, I do not appear to have any problems receiving or sending > emails, > outside of this minor temperror message. > > However, the header kind of irks me, since it always returns the > following header. > > Received-SPF: Temperror(mailfrom) > > > But, I would like to receive this > > Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) > > my domain is little-beak at com > > I have included all my files below, also in case anyone is in the > mood > to help a brother out. =) I am still learning, and want as solid as a > system as possible. > > I have setup dkim and dmarc, and they seem to be working as expected, > generally passing, the former, or reporting, the latter. > > Thanks to any and everyone that could offer a helping hand. That means DNS lookups aren't working correctly. You need to look in your mail log for information about the failure to get more information about why it fails. From an SPF perspective, your configuration looks correct. Scott K
