On 07/04/2019 01:58, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Saturday, April 06, 2019 06:32:18 PM André Rodier wrote:
On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 16:55 +0000, Laura Smith wrote:
Hi,
Am currently refreshing my perimeter mail infrastructure.
The current state of affairs of DKIM signing looks pretty miserable!
DKIMProxy seems to be abandonware since 2010
OpenDKIM seems to be going the way of abandonware too (last release in
2015 and the bug tracker filling up).
I've had a quick search on github for DKIM but can't find much of
interest.
We all know what software is like, you have to keep it fed and watered
otherwise it starts growing bugs (or worse). I'm not too keen on using
software of 2015 vintage.
What is everybody using these days ? Or have I missed something in the
world of email and everyone's moved from DKIM to the Next Best Thing
(TM).
Looking forward to your suggestions
Laura
Hello Laura,
I am using OpenDKIM on Debian Stretch, no issue at all.
One explanation might be the standard has not changed since 2015, so
neither the binaries. If a major or even a minor change rise in the
standard, I am sure the binaries will be updated.
If you check the DKIM web site, you will see most of the documentation
is old as well. http://www.dkim.org/.
Adding new features on a software that works is also a nice way to add
more bugs ;-). Perhaps the libraries are actually working for most of
people.
Kind regards,
André
The standard has changed. See RFC 8301 and RFC 8463.
Scott K
Thanks, I was not aware of this, I try to follow DKIM, but perhaps I was
not using the right site. None of these standards are referenced on
opendkim.org.
André
