On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, TG Servers wrote:
Yes thanks Nick I am signing with rspamd and will have to check the
signed headers there
as this seems not compliant, I already checked that from the other
mails, thanks for the hint to you, too
I also use rspamd, and had exactly the same problem you're facing now.
I now (for some time already) use a more relaxed sign_headers in my
local.d/dkim_signing.conf
sign_headers = 'from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references';
i.e. no oversigning and no "sender" in there.
(I also have policy=none and send received reports to /dev/null but don't
tell anyone! :)
Cheers,
Bernardo.
