On 4/23/19 2:40 PM, lists wrote: > I would investigate using rspamd rather than spamassassin. At the moment > I run neither since I have settled upon a nice mix of RBLs and check the > reverse pointer. That Perl code to get rid of dynamic domains really > helps nuke spammers. > > Spamassassin tends to use a lot of memory. When I was using it, I had it > on a rather memory limited VPS and actually needed to use VM.
I'm using rspamd myself, though it's clear I still have a lot to learn about configuring and training it. I used to use DSpam, and was getting excellent results with it — something over 99.97% accuracy — but it was abandoned and eventually became unmaintainable. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: +1.603.293.8485 Mobile: +1.603.998.6958
