> On May 22, 2019, at 1:50 PM, MRob <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for pointing it out. Why is default for the setting same as
> header_checks? I don't understand the common need for smtp server to run the
> same header checks on attachment headers, can someone explain?
This is backwards-compatibility. I agree that in most cases you'll
want nested_header_checks to either be empty, or written specifically
to handle some appropriate requirement, separate from the primary
header checks.
--
Viktor.
