Willy Tarreau:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 08:21:05AM +0100, Tam?s G?rczei wrote:
> > Thanks Wietse, this is what I thought and found out during my
> > experiments,That said, now knowing that only v1 is supported, may I ask
> > whether you have considered implementing v2 support? I'm about to
> > migrate to a setup where I'm behind a load balancer that only speaks v2.
>
> Maybe you can try to implement v2 support ? Parsing v2 when v1 is already
> supported is quite easy, especially at the same level of support (i.e. no
> TLV field support for TLS or whatever). You can have a look at
> conn_recv_proxy() in haproxy:src/connection.c which supports the two
> versions. Feel free to steal any code I wrote there, if that helps :-)
I'm looking into this, and a Postfix-quality implementation including
tests(!) is going to take more than a few hours. Primarily, because
v2 uses a binary protocol, which complicates everything. I'll put a
few hours in today.
Wietse
