On 8/3/22 10:24, Linkcheck wrote:
Thank you, Matus. I have considered pstscreen in the past but decided it
was an extra layer of complexity I could manage without.
I also find zen.spamhaus reliable but is the spamhaus suggestion for
postfix a) good and b) all that is needed? For example, is dbl.spamhaus,
as they suggest, a good idea for Sender, Helo and Reverse_Client or will
it contribute more unwanted blocks? It appears to be dangerous in my
current situation.
On 03.08.22 11:28, Phil Stracchino wrote:
One quick comment: If you run rspamd, do not put RBL tests in
postscreen, configure them in rspamd instead, or rspamd will not see
the RBL failures and will be unable to learn from them.
running dnsbl/dnswl checks from postscreen spares your machine from
processing mail from blocklisted sites.
if you block those, there's no need to run rspamd and if you don't block
them, rspamd can still redo those checks (and they should be caches in your
nameserver, so no redundant DNS queries will go to those lists.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux IS user friendly, it's just selective who its friends are...
