I can live w/ it. +1
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Sandro Santilli <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for feature freeze of 2.1.0 --strk; > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:52:35PM -0400, Paragon Corporation wrote: >> I want to officially vote for feature freeze for 2.1. And I'm asking both >> PostGIS devs and PSC to provide vote / input / concerns. >> >> From this point forward. Anything that is not marked for 2.1 at this moment >> that will change user facing API (ie new functions etc) (or is not a bug >> fix) that is not currently slated for 2.1, has to be pushed to the new 2.2 >> (that I added this week) or PostGIS Future milestone. >> >> Whatever is left as a new enhancement in 2.1 we'll try our hardest to commit >> by next week and if can't consider pushing to 2.2. >> So we can have a feature complete beta1 release to go along with PostgreSQL >> 9.3 beta 1. >> >> Guys sorry but we have to stop at some point and now sounds like a good >> stopping point. I'm putting my foot down :) >> >> +1 > _______________________________________________ > postgis-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
