Dude, I am soooo dumb.  You're right, the query planner difference is in the 
WHERE.  And, yes, right again, I need to use the && to trigger the index, which 
works much more swiftly.

/r/b
________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] on behalf of BladeOfLight16 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:08 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Query PLanning for spatial containment

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Burgholzer, Robert (DEQ) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
I just noticed something interesting, perhaps its trivial and well understood, 
but this is the first time I figured it out (older postgis and postgresql to 
boot).  I am doing a spatial containment query on two tables, table "a" being a 
point table in SRID 4326, with GIST index, and table "b" being a polygon with 
GIST index in SRID 26918, using the "transform" function to bring them into a 
common projection.  If I apply the transform to the polygon layer, the query 
planner (and indeed the query) is verrrry slow, whereas, if I apply the 
transform to the point layer, things go along much more swiftly.  Now I know, 
so I just thought I'd share, if anyone has any suggestions of course, I would 
be delighted to hear them.

Are you sure it's not the filter Filter: ((riverseg)::text = 
'PS3_5100_5080'::text) that appears to only be present in the first query? I do 
notice that the estimate from the sc_cbp53 goes down from 1447 to 1 with the 
filter. EXPLAIN ANALYZE would give more information about what actually 
happened, and I wouldn't expect the query planner to behave the same in other 
versions of PostGIS. You might also benefit from a spatial index, and I believe 
in the older version, you need to do a bounding box check (&&) manually to 
trigger use of the index. (I can't recall which version, but one version of 
PostGIS built the && check into ST_Contains and many other functions.)
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to