You can use ST_PixelAsCentroids(ST_AsRaster()) to generate a regular grid of 
points inside a polygon.

Pierre

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:postgis-users-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rémi Cura
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 6:41 AM
> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Grid of points inside Polygon
> 
> This would be an improvement but still non efficient.
> 
> you have 2 possibilities, supposing that what you want is points 20 meter
> spaced in all road_buf  :
> 
> either you compute for each road_buffer the points inside, one road at a
> time ( figuratively ).
> 
> 
>       This means you write a function which generates points 20-meter
> spaced in the bounding box of the road you are working on, and keep those
> in the real road buffer, and group result points as a multipoints (for
> cosmetic purpose)
>       .
> 
> 
>       You would then use it like this :
> 
>       SELECT road_id, points_insidea_road(the_geom) AS
> my_points_inside_the_road
>       FROM road_polygons_table
> 
> 
> 
>       You would have as output a line per road with a multipoint
> containing all the point 20 meter spaced inside the road.
> 
> 
> 
> Or (what you wrote) you generate all points and keep those intersecting
> one or many road.
> 
> 
> The first one is mandatory, because it avoids to manipulate (incredibly) big
> table of all points spaced by 20 meters for UK (around 500 * 10^6 points ! )
> Even with indexes it's not a good idea to use such number of rows.
> 
> 
> That's the first point (write a function working for one road, then use it for
> all road).
> 
> 
> The second point is the way you compute is very inefficient. If your road is
> going from south-West to NorthEast, you will generate a very big number of
> points, and very few will be in the road_buffer. This is problematic as for a
> road of only 20 kms, you may generate as many as 100k points and keep
> only few of them. If you want to process hundreds of ks or roads it will
> become very problematic. Also you would have to generate points each
> time.
> 
> 
> So here is what  I suggest you : change your strategy :
>  instead of generating all point in bounding box and then keeping only those
> in road_buffer,
> generate a line every 20 meters going North south and an line every 20
> meters going East-West , then use the function ST_Intersection to keep only
> part of this lines being inside the road_polygon, then you have the points
> inside road_polygons as the intersections of these EW lines with the SN
> lines.
> 
> 
> It will be very efficient because you can create a table with all the lines 
> going
> East-West and South-North for great britain (about 25k + 50k lines), and
> build index on it (index on geom and on the column saying if it is SN or EW).
> 
> 
> The trick is the number of lines is around 500km * 50 line/km + 1000km *
> 50 line/km , where the number of points is  500km * 50 line/km * 1000km
> * 50 line/km
> 
> 
> Hope it helps,
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Rémi-C
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/11/13 James David Smith <[email protected]>
> 
> 
>       Hey Remi,
> 
>       Thanks for your reply. So in your mind you think we should have a
>       database of say 300 polygons, and then we run a command like this
>       right?
> 
>       SELECT
>       ST_Collect(st_setsrid(ST_POINT(x,y),27700))
>       FROM
>       generate_series(53320::int, 667380::int,20) as x,
>       generate_series(7780::int, 1226580::int,20) as y,
>       road_polygons_table
>       WHERE
>       st_intersects(road_polygons_table.the_geom,
> st_setsrid(ST_POINT(x,y),27700))
> 
>       What do you think?
> 
>       Thanks
> 
>       James
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       On 11 November 2013 14:51, Rémi Cura <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>       > Hey,
>       > the whole point on using a sgbds like postgis is using index.
>       >
>       > If you have one line you don't use indexes...
>       >
>       > So in short, don't make one polygon with a buffer of all the road,
> but a
>       > table with a line for the buffer for every road, then do you
> computation to
>       > create grid of points inside of polygons, then union the result of
> points!
>       >
>       > And it s always a bad idea to run a function on big data when you
> have not
>       > tested it fully (including scaling behavior) on small data.
>       >
>       >
>       > Cheers
>       > Rémi-C
>       >
>       >
>       > 2013/11/11 James David Smith <[email protected]>
>       >>
>       >> Hi all,
>       >>
>       >> Would appreciate some advice on the best way to accomplish
> this please.
>       >>
>       >> Our situation is that we have a single polygon which has been
> created
>       >> by buffering all of the major roads in the UK. Projection is
> OSGB36
>       >> (27700). Obviously it's quite a big polygon.
>       >>
>       >> -->  SELECT st_area(geom) FROM roadbufferunion;
>       >>      st_area
>       >> ------------------
>       >>  77228753220.8271
>       >>
>       >> What we now want to do is create a regular grid of 20 metre x 20
> metre
>       >> points instead the polygon area. So we wrote this function
> (based on
>       >> some googling, apologies for not being able to recall the exact
> person
>       >> who originally wrote it):
>       >>
>       >> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION makegrid(geometry, integer,
> integer)
>       >> RETURNS geometry AS
>       >> 'SELECT ST_Collect(st_setsrid(ST_POINT(x,y),$3)) FROM
>       >>   generate_series(53320::int, 667380::int,$2) as x
>       >>   ,generate_series(7780::int, 1226580::int,$2) as y
>       >> where st_intersects($1,st_setsrid(ST_POINT(x,y),$3))'
>       >> LANGUAGE sql
>       >>
>       >> and we then run this by doing the following:
>       >>
>       >> SELECT st_x((ST_Dump(makegrid(geom, 20, 27700))).geom) as x,
>       >> st_y((ST_Dump(makegrid(geom, 20, 27700))).geom) as y INTO
> grid_points
>       >> from roadbufferunion;
>       >>
>       >> However after over 2 days of the query running on a pretty
> powerful
>       >> linux cluster, we still have no result.  I'm not sure if it is
>       >> actually running or not to be honest.
>       >>
>       >> Does the query look right?
>       >> Any ideas how we can make it run quicker?
>       >>
>       >> Thanks
>       >>
>       >> James
>       >> _______________________________________________
>       >> postgis-users mailing list
>       >> [email protected]
>       >> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       > _______________________________________________
>       > postgis-users mailing list
>       > [email protected]
>       > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>       _______________________________________________
>       postgis-users mailing list
>       [email protected]
>       http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to