On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:33:05PM +0200, Rémi Cura wrote: > Hm I don't understand. > > The point is to get this bouding rectangle axis. > So why compute convex hull?
If you had to use your initial rotate & try approach, taking the convexhull would reduce the cost of rotation. --strk; > > Cheers, > Rémi-C > > 2014-10-23 16:23 GMT+02:00 Sandro Santilli <[email protected]>: > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:15:06PM +0200, Rémi Cura wrote: > > > > > _I'm precisely looking for 2 axis (convex hull is excluded then) > > > > I don't see how any bounding rectangle could touch vertices > > that are not part of the convex hull. > > > > --strk; > > _______________________________________________ > > postgis-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users -- () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
