"Regina Obe" <l...@pcorp.us> writes: >> The proposals are: > > 1) Move raster to its own extension "postgis_raster" > See https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3888
this gets us two extensions, and if we split into N, we will have N extensions. > 2) Provide two versions of extension "postgis" > See https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3890 If we split into N, we will end up with 2^N. I think 2^N is untenable, and option 1 is therefore the only reasonable choice. I don't see the pain of people updating to the new world as being large or that hard.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
