Yeah, every time I’ve thought about renderer-in-the-db I’ve come back to this. There’s nothing especially privileged about the db that makes a lot of sense for bringing rendering in-process. And boy it’s a rat hole… once you go down, you’re never coming back out.
P > On Jan 29, 2019, at 5:36 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote: > > Are you sure you want to reimplement what a GIS does already? Doing proper, > powerful styling it's a really big task. > Sorry to jump in like this, I'm a strong advocate of open source tools also > because you can reuse what is available, avoiding duplication of efforts. > Cheers. > > Il 30 gennaio 2019 02:13:50 CET, Martin Davis <mtncl...@gmail.com > <mailto:mtncl...@gmail.com>> ha scritto: > Here's an idea which might be a bit out there... > > Allow styling/labelling to be driven by columns in the displayed query. The > styling columns would have well-known names which are unlikely to conflict > with data columns. A nice pattern to follow is the SVG style names. So e.g. > styleStroke = line color, styleFill - fill color, styleStrokeWidth = line > width, etc etc etc. styleLabel would be the string to label with. > > This allows styling to be data-driven and easily captured and shared. > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:16 PM Victoria Rautenbach > <victoria.rautenb...@gmail.com <mailto:victoria.rautenb...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Dear PostGIS devs and users > > Firstly, we (Frikan, Xuri and I) would like to thank the PostGIS > community again for the support you provided us in 2018 during Google > Summer of Code (GSoC). We truly appreciate your time and effort. > > The call for OSGeo GSoC ideas is now out [1]. Frikan and I would like > to suggest a project to address some of the issues left in the > geometry viewer (available in pgAdmin4), but also include some new > functionality. > > Are there any ideas or suggestions from you, the PostGIS community, > for extra functionalities that would improve the usefulness of the > geometry viewer? > > Thank you in advance. > > Regards > Victoria > > > [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/soc/2019-January/004200.html > <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/soc/2019-January/004200.html> > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users> > -- > Sorry for being short_______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users>
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users