Hi all, I would like to ask, whether you are aware of any big performance differences or any other serious reasons, why could shp2pgsql and raster2pgsql be preferred over ogr2ogr and gdal_translate ?
From the users perspective, I can use both tools on similar manner and have no problem with "complex" gdal data model and parameters options and I would probably prefer the GDAL tools, since it allows me to translate between various formats without specifically care, what they are, while *2pgsql is always Postgres specific Maybe one missing feature of the PostGIS native tools: is there elegant way (besides of subprocess module), how to use them in Python(3) environment? Thank you for clarification Jachym -- Jachym Cepicky e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com URL: http://les-ejk.cz GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
