There is one key step that tripped me up - the raster part of PostGIS was split into its own extension. After updating the extensions within Postgres, the new postgis-raster extension will be "updated" as an "unpackaged" extension - it won't be visible but will be there and usable. It could cause trouble later if you upgrade Postgis again or Postgres (I had a couple missing raster functions that caused a Postgres upgrade failure).
To fix this see the manual, there's a note at the bottom of the soft upgrade with extensions section. ----- William Kyngesburye <kyngch...@kyngchaos.com> <http://www.kyngchaos.com> Don't Panic > On May 26, 2020, at 3:30 AM, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) > <markus.zwett...@zuerich.ch> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > We used and had postgis24 installed: > > postgis24_96-client-2.4.8-5.rhel7.x86_64 > postgis24_96-2.4.8-5.rhel7.x86_64 > pgrouting_96-2.6.2-1.rhel7.x86_64 > ogr_fdw96-1.0.8-1.rhel7.x86_64 > > > After an Linux update postgis30 packages were installed: > > postgis30_96-client-3.0.1-5.rhel7.x86_64 > postgis30_96-3.0.1-5.rhel7.x86_64 > pgrouting_96-3.0.0-rc1_2.rhel7.x86_64 > ogr_fdw96-1.0.9-1.rhel7.x86_64 > > > Afaik, we must do an "alter extension postgis update" now. > > > QUESTION: Is an update to postgis30 that easy? Could there be any problems? > > > Thanks, > Markus > > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
