+1 paul On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 9:22 PM Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote:
> PostgreSQL 9.6 has reached EOL so I don't think there is any point in > supporting it in PostGIS 3.3. > > https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ > > > PostgreSQL 10 will be EOL'd before or very close to our planned 3.3 release > so we should get rid of that too. > > There is not much savings with only dropping 9.6 because most of our ifdefs > are at the 11, 12, and 14 mile posts. > > PROS > 1) It will speed up our testing if we don't need to test these 2. > 2) Much fewer ifdefs > 3) Less looking back down the past of what is legit for what version of > PostgreSQL. > > CONS > PostgreSQL 9.6, 10 people can't run 3.3, but why would they anyway. > Upgrading from PostgreSQL 10 some 3+ -> PostgreSQL something_supported 3.3 > would be the way to go anyway and now much less painful now that we don't > have the minor in the lib file anymore. > > Thanks, > Regina > > > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users >
_______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
