> On Nov 12, 2023, at 08:51, Troels Arvin <tro...@arvin.dk> wrote:
> 
> OK, that sounds like I may need to plan with more downtime. But then again: 
> If I can verify, that no code is using the aggregates/types which pg_restore 
> complains about (such as the public.accum aggregate), shouldn't it be OK to 
> pg_dump->pg_restore directly to the newer installation?

You can try it and see, although there are a sufficient number of other upgrade 
steps between those two PostGIS versions that I would advise the more 
methodical approach.
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to