"Regina Obe" <l...@pcorp.us> writes: > Paul and Sandro, > > Any thoughts on this. I know we went back and forth with "Why don't > we just populate spatial_ref_sys using postgis_srs_all or some other > such thing or why don't we just change spatial_ref_sys to a view that > relegates to reading these from proj.db make spatial_ref_sys a view or > why don't we make it a reduced set. > Not sure where we landed on that discussion. > > Before the issue was because we supported such old proj versions, but now our > minimum for 3.5 is 6.1 so all the options we had are now doable with our > minimum proj version.
I think part of this comes down to Are we just deferring to EPSG, or are we becoming an authority for including and/or defining SRSes? I thought it was "postgis uses database in proj and is not an authority", but am I off?
