That phrase is no longer in the doco, looks like it got fixed after 3.2 release.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 11:39 AM Michael Downey <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! > > > > *From:* Paul Ramsey <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2026 11:38 AM > *To:* Michael Downey <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: When did this 'officially' change? "SQL-MM defines the > default SRID of all geometry constructors as 0. PostGIS uses a default SRID > of -1." > > > > PostGIS 2.0? 14 years ago > > > > https://github.com/postgis/postgis/blob/master/NEWS#L1937 [github.com] > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/postgis/postgis/blob/master/NEWS*L1937__;Iw!!CKZwjTOV!3yYvUnUVO6JZpb3quhgJNZvGxIrrJ-8WLx1ZqGThN6rLytjb8XDhluBJKpOw_nLJxA8tmDouYe0kH_nLz0NQQA$> > > > > Wheeps, that's a long-time doo error. > > > > P. > > > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 11:31 AM Michael Downey via postgis-users < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I see this note > > “SQL-MM defines the default SRID of all geometry constructors as 0. > PostGIS uses a default SRID of -1" on the > PostGIS_Special_Functions_Index.html page all the way though 3.2 > > https://postgis.net/docs/manual-3.2/PostGIS_Special_Functions_Index.html > [postgis.net] > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/postgis.net/docs/manual-3.2/PostGIS_Special_Functions_Index.html__;!!CKZwjTOV!3yYvUnUVO6JZpb3quhgJNZvGxIrrJ-8WLx1ZqGThN6rLytjb8XDhluBJKpOw_nLJxA8tmDouYe0kH_kQKNXXQA$> > > > > Since then it is not there. > > > > I have not checked this question under versions < 3.4. AI results indicate > that it was 3.0 when it started. A question from a user in our community > indicates 2.0. > > > > Perhaps it started at an earlier time and culminated at 3.3? > > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > >
