Ask yourself why you'd want to do this. Typically, when you draw the info, you want to symbolize lines, polygons, points differently, so would not having them in a big lump present difficulties, as opposed to resolve them?
And certainly if you want to analyze the info, having everything schmodged together would probably be less than helpful. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I see. So a postGIS database view can never have the > full functionality of APR project file. > > But that's still okay as long as the postGIS view can > merge adjacent spatial tables in a big, "united" > spatial view. Can geomunion achieve that? > > And can it merge spatial tables of different type of > vectors? (point, lines, polygons, etc) > > > Thanks, > -Kresh > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > So be it. If saying "NO" means being alone, then to hell with love, with > women, with marriage, with God, religions, bars, nightclubs, computer games, > and all the shit life keeps pumping at me. I'll walk alone, but with freedom > and a healed pride. > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > -- Regards, Chris Hermansen · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+1.604.714.2878 · fax:+1.604.733.0631 Timberline Natural Resource Group · http://www.timberline.ca 401 · 958 West 8th Avenue · Vancouver BC · Canada · V5Z 1E5 C'est ma façon de parler. _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
