Sounds good to me. If you wanted to see which geoms caused the problem, couldn't you just run another query looking only for ones which returned NULL from the operation, and then check the log?

The log msg could also give the first couple of points of the offending geoms - that would narrow it down pretty good.

Does ST_Contains (and the other predicates) ever result in TopologyExceptions? They are generally pretty darn robust, to my knowledge. It's the overlay ops which are the real bad boys.

Paul Ramsey wrote:
On 3/12/08, Martin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Orginally the idea was that it was nice to report the actual nature of
 the exception, since it contains an indication of where the error
 occurred.   It would be nice to be able to continue to have access to
 this information.  One way to do this would be to have a parallel set of
 functions which would abort as they do now.  Or is there some other way
 to report this info - to a log somewhere perhaps?

I prefer using something like NULL to trying to create a new geometry
type to encompass the error... particularly if the error conditions
aren't that interesting to people.  We can get into the log easily
enough by using a WARNING log level, the only question then is how to
identify which geometries caused the failure.  One way might be to
hash the geometries, so that if people want to find their bad
geometries from the log they can just select for the hash value.

This means that the return values of

ST_Contains(geom,geom) => true, false or null

and

ST_Intersection(geom,geom) => geometry or null

I just checked, and null seems to be interpreted as false in a WHERE
clause, so adding this behavior probably wouldn't wreck too many
joins.

Paul
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


--
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022

_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to