There is a patch in svn now, download postgis-svn and see if things are better, they should be.
P On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Stefan Schwarzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for coming back to this issue... (and for sending a similar mail just > a couple of minutes ago before I realized that this subject already was > discussed - but not solved...) > > Is there any chance that this subject (for 10.5) has been solved? Any > suggestions? I used the macports to install postgres (8.2) and postgis > (1.3.1)... > > Thanks for any suggestions. It's weeks now that I try to get the stuff > running, with lots of (re)installations.... but in vain... > > Stef > > > > > On Mar 5, 2008, at 4:08 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote: > > > > Stefan, you're using my PostGIS binary? I thought I had renamed the > Postgis getopt() to force it to be the one used, but looking at my source I > see that I didn't, this time. I must have downloaded a fresh copy of the > source and forgot that patch. > > > > And, do you have a 64bit Mac (Core 2 Duo) or one of the first 32bit Core > Duo Macs? > > > > Mark, I don't know about the original why, but in this case, the PostGIS > getopt() works, while the OSX 10.5 32bit getopt() does not. The 64bit OSX > getopt() does work. There has been a system update since then, so I need to > test it again. (actually, very soon, since I was just about to rebuild for > Postgres 8.3) > > > > On Mar 5, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > > > > > > > On Wednesday 05 March 2008 05:51:12 Stefan Schwarzer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ah... yes indeed. 10.5. > > > > > > > > So, what do you recommend? Wait and see? Hmm.... > > > > > > > > > > I think the first question to ask is why do we supply our own copy of > getopt > > > with shp2pgsql/pgsql in the first place? Is it because it's missing on > > > something like Solaris? My temptation would be to simply remove it, and > let > > > everything use the system getopt... > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Mark. > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com> > > http://www.kyngchaos.com/ > > > > "This is a question about the past, is it? ... How can I tell that the > past isn't a fiction designed to account for the discrepancy between my > immediate physical sensations and my state of mind?" > > > > - The Ruler of the Universe > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
