> This relation has quite a complex expression in terms of the IM pattern > languge. It is: > > [T********] or [*T*******] or [***T*****] or [****T****] > and not ( [FT*******] or [F**T*****] or [F***T****] ) > > This is equivalent to: > > not ([FF*FF****] or [FT*******] or [F**T*****] or [F***T****] ) >
Well, even if I would have read your email in great detail, I couldn't guess such a pattern... gosh ! Nico _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
