Dylan Beaudette wrote:
Strange. I have never modified that code before, and regularly get the correct output... I will post back with a similar example that causes PostGIS to throw the '-38' error.
Dylan, Another correspondent indicated to me that when he applied this change, he got different, better results even though he wasn't seeing this specific error message (perhaps because he wasn't at the psql prompt when the transform operation occurred). We're both running Linux. How do you know what the correct output is? Peter -- Peter N. Schweitzer (MS 954, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192) (703) 648-6533 FAX: (703) 648-6252 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://geology.usgs.gov/peter/> _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
